Skip to the main content.

3 min read

Me, Me, Me – how first party data helps QSRs to deliver personalised loyalty

Me, Me, Me – how first party data helps QSRs to deliver personalised loyalty

QSR operators know that their customers want loyalty programs. More than that – they demand it. But not just the run of the mill, ‘one size fits all’ old-style loyalty programs. What today’s discerning QSR customers want is ‘Me’ loyalty – a program that is personalised and tailored to their unique preferences and behaviours.

In fact consumers are so enamoured of personalisation that 58% of them would ‘switch half or more of their spending to a provider that excels at personalising experiences without compromising trust.’

Almost half (45%) of QSR customers are influenced into spending more money more frequently if they receive personalised offers.  

More money, more often – that’s the holy grail of QSR loyalty, and personalisation holds the key.

 

Getting to know you – the power of data

To personalise though, you have to know the person in question – and in today’s digital world, that means data. Capturing, analysing and actioning data is the secret to personalisation and to getting the best bang for every loyalty buck.

An effective personalisation strategy starts with a data strategy, including

  • Deciding what data to collect and from where
  • Validating and standardising the data to create a single source of truth – with consistent formatting and naming standards.
  • Ensuring appropriate controls are in place for data integrity and governance. 
  • Analysing the data to understand the story it is telling you – interpret the data and develop the appropriate personalisation action plans.

So, it all starts with data. But not all data is created equal.

One of the biggest distinctions being between first party and third party data. So let’s take a look at both, and explain why the future of personalisation lies very firmly with the first party variety.

 

First vs third party data

Essentially first party data is that which the QSR collects themselves. It can come from a range of sources – POS, the loyalty program, website, online ordering and delivery apps, CRM, customer surveys and feedback, social media or call centres. First party data can include information about demographics, behaviours, interests, time spent on websites and pages visited, purchase history and other interactions.   

Third party data is data that is collected by a separate organisation, and passed on to the QSR. It is typically collected via third party cookies on a website, or via ordering and delivery service aggregators, who capture and pass on information about all orders on their platform. Relying on third party or aggregator data can slow down your responsiveness, and leave you trying to personalise your message to customers based on data that is generic rather than specific.

That makes for several significant differences:

  • Accuracy and relevance - because first party data is collected directly, it is all from the QSR’s own customers, so is highly accurate and 100% relevant. It is collected from people with whom the QSR has a direct relationship, from actual interactions with the brand. Aggregated data on the other hand, comes from customers of a whole range of different QSRs. Important detail can get lost in the mix, and customer behaviours may not always be relevant to the QSR trying to use the data.
  • Consent and trust – first party data is knowingly provided to the QSR by the customer. They know that the QSR is obliged to protect that data under GDPR rules. By contrast, third party data has been passed on, often without the customer’s knowledge or consent. It is not subject to the same regulations and certainly doesn’t generate anywhere near the level of trust. So much so that third party cookies look set to be phased out by Apple and Google in their browsers.
  • Control and real time access – when a QSR collects its own first party data, it has immediate access. This allows rapid analysis and action, giving them a head start on competitors who are waiting to get their data from a third party. First party data puts the QSR in the driving seat, with their foot firmly on the accelerator.

So for true personalisation, it’s clear to see why first party data wins hands down every time.

 

Using an aggregation service for orders and delivery can initially look attractive, but taking the third party route means that QSRs are cutting themselves off from that most valuable of assets – their own data. That’s why so many now prefer a white label offering such as Redcat Delivery. White label means that the QSR is capturing first party data – data that is relevant, accurate and timely and is the foundation of truly effective personalised loyalty. 

The rise of the dark kitchen and virtual brands, and what it means for restaurant operators.

4 min read

The rise of the dark kitchen and virtual brands, and what it means for restaurant operators.

Time for dinner - and Australians around the country open up a food ordering app, scroll their favourite cuisines and place an online order for...

Read More
The rewards of giving – how your loyalty program can benefit you, your customers and the community

4 min read

The rewards of giving – how your loyalty program can benefit you, your customers and the community

Loyalty – essential to QSR and fast casuals

Read More
Delivery shouldn’t die because dine-in is back on the menu

2 min read

Delivery shouldn’t die because dine-in is back on the menu

Originally appeared on Inside Small Business

Read More